Microsoft Says Clients Of Azure Cloud Platform May Experience Increased Latency



Microsoft Corp. said Saturday it’s no longer detecting issues with its Azure cloud platform after multiple international cables in the Red Sea were cut, Engadget reported.

Microsoft said its Azure cloud platform has returned to normal service after an incident of cut underwater cables that played out over Saturday. The tech giant reported “undersea fiber cuts” in the Red Sea on Saturday morning, which disrupted Azure service throughout the Middle Eat and led to potential “increased latency” for users. 

Microsoft said that the latency issue was resolved by Saturday evening and was able to reroute the Azure traffic through other paths.

Microsoft didn’t provide a reason for why the undersea cables were cut. These cables sit on the ocean floor and play the crucial role of delivering massive amounts of data across the world. 

While ships dropping anchors can sometimes damage undersea cables, there have been more international circumstances in the past. In 2024, the internationally recognized government of Yemen claimed that the country’s Houthi movement was responsible for cutting cables in the Red Sea. 

The Associated Press reported: United cable cuts in the Red Sea disrupted international access is parts of Asia and the Middle East, experts said Sunday, though it was not immediately clear what caused the incident.

There has been concern about the cables being targeted in a Red Sea campaign by Yemen’s Houthi rebels, which the rebels describe as an effort to pressure Israel to end its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. But the Houthis have denied attacking the lines in the past.

Undersea cables are one of the backbones of the internet, along with satellite connections and land-based cables. Typically, internet service providers have multiple access points and reroute traffic if one fails, though it can slow down access for users.

Microsoft announced via a status website that the Mideast “may experience increased latency due to undersea fiber cuts in the Red Sea.” The Redmond, Washington-based firm did not immediately elaborate, though it said that internet traffic not moving through the Middle East “is not impacted.”

TechCrunch reported: Microsoft said Saturday that clients of its Azure platform might experience increased latency after multiple undersea cables were cut in the Red Sea, as reported in Bloomberg.

In a status update, the company said traffic going through the Middle East or ending in Asia or Europe had been affected. It did not say who had cut the cables or why.

“Undersea fiber cuts can take time to repair, such as we continuously monitor, rebalance and optimize routing to reduce customer impact in the meantime,” the status update said.

By Saturday evening, Microsoft said it was no longer detecting any Azure issues. But it seems Azure was not the only service affected, with NetBlocks reported that “a series of subsea cable outages in the Red Sea has degraded internet connectivity in multiple countries.”


Anthropic Agrees To Pay $1.5 Billion To Settle Lawsuit With Book Authors



In a landmark settlement, Anthropic, a leading artificial intelligence company, has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to a group of authors and publishers after a judge ruled it had illegally downloaded and stored millions of copyrighted books, The New York Times reported.

The settlement is the largest payout in the history of U.S. copyright cases. Anthropic will pay $3,000 per work to 500,000 authors.

The agreement is a turning point in a continuing battle between A.I companies and copyright holders that spans more than 40 lawsuits across the country. Experts say the agreement could pave the way for more tech companies to pay rights holders through court decisions and settlements or through licensing fees.

“This is massive,” said Chad Hummel, a trial lawyer with the law firm McKool Smith, who is not involved in this case. “This will cause generative A.I. companies to sit up and take notice.”

The agreement is reminiscent of the early 2000s, when courts ruled that file-sharing services like Napster and Grokster infringed on rights holders by allowing copyrighted songs, movies, and other material to be shared free on the Internet.

The Verge reported: In what’s potentially the first major payout to creatives whose work was used to train AI systems, Anthropic has reached an agreement to pay “at least” a staggering $1.5 billion, plus interest, to authors to settle its class-action lawsuit. 

The amount brakes down to smaller payouts expected to be approximately $3,000 per book or work. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said it’s “believed to the the largest publicity reported recovery in the history of US copyright litigation.”

The settlement is subject to court approval, and a hearing will take place on September 8th. According to a press release, the final amount could be higher, in that approximately 500,000 works will likely be paid out, but if the total is higher than that, Anthropic will pay an additional $3,000 per work, and it all depends on the number of claims submitted. As part of the settlement, Anthropic must also destroy the original files it downloaded and any copies.

The Wall Street Journal reported: Artificial intelligence company Anthropic agreed to pay at least $1.5 billion to settle a copyright infringement lawsuit over its use of pirated books to train large-language models.

Lawyers for plaintiffs said in a court hearing Friday that, if approved, the proposed settlement would be the largest of its kind. 

The settlement could influence the outcome of pending litigation between other media companies and AI firms, and may push the tech companies to seek licensing agreement with content owners whose works are considered vital for training purposes.

The federal suit, filed in California last summer by three authors, alleged that Anthropic violated copyright laws by using millions of pirated works train its Claude AI models and tried to cover up its copyright theft.


Google Fined $3.5 Billion By EU Over Ad-Tech Business



The European Commission has waged a €2.95 billion fine against Google for “abusing its dominant position” in advertising technology. In its announcement, the Commission claims that Google’s alleged anticompetitive practices have increased costs for advertisers and publishers, potentially raising prices for consumers as a result, The Verge reported.

The Commission has ordered Google to come up with a plan to stop its anticompetitive practices that it must submit within 60 days. “If it fails to propose a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy,” the Commission states, adding that the solution may involve forcing Google to sell off parts of its ad tech business.

The European Commission opened an investigation into Google’s advertising technology business in June 2021, and later brought up the possibility of divesture in 2023. The US Department of Justice similarly asked a federal judge to break up Google’s ad tech business after determining that it violates antitrust laws.

The European Commission reported: The European Commission has fined Google €2.95 billion for breaching EU antitrust rules by distorting competition in the advertising technology industry.

It did so by favoring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of competing providers and advertising technology and services to the detriment of competing providers of advertising technology services, advertiser and online publishers.

BBC reported: Google has been fined €2.95bn by the EU for allegedly abusing its power in the ad tech sector – the technology which determines which adverts should be placed online and where.

The European Commission said on Friday the tech giant had breached competition laws by favoring its own products for displaying online ads, to the detriment of rivals.

It comes amid increased scrutiny by regulators worldwide over the tech giant’s empire in online search and advertising.

Google told the BBC the Commission’s decision was “wrong” and it would appeal.

“It imposes an unjustified fine and requires changes that will hurt thousands of European businesses by making it harder for them to make money,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, global head of regulatory affairs at Google.

“There’s nothing anti-competitive in providing services for ad buyers and sellers, and there are more alternatives to our services than ever before.”


YouTube’s Premium Family Plan Faces New Restrictions #1842



YouTube is enforcing stricter rules for its Premium Family plan, requiring all members to live in the same household. Non-eligible users will lose Premium benefits after 14 days, following Netflix’s 2023 policy shift to curb account sharing and drive new subscriptions.

-Want to be a Guest on a Podcast or YouTube Channel? Sign up for GuestMatch.Pro
-Thinking of buying a Starlink? Use my link to support the show.

Subscribe to the Newsletter.
Join the Chat @ GeekNews.Chat
Email Todd or follow him on Facebook.
Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page.
Download the Audio Show File
New YouTube Channel – Beyond the Office

Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes
$11.99 – For a New Domain Name cjcfs3geek
$6.99 a month Economy Hosting (Free domain, professional email, and SSL certificate for the 1st year.) Promo Code: cjcgeek1h
$12.99 a month Managed WordPress Hosting (Free domain, professional email, and SSL certificate for the 1st year.) Promo Code: cjcgeek1w
Support the show by becoming a Geek News Central Insider

Continue reading YouTube’s Premium Family Plan Faces New Restrictions #1842


Atlassian Agrees To Acquire The Browser Company For $610M In Cash



Atlassian said it has agreed to acquire The Browser Company Co., a startup that offers a web browser with artificial intelligence features, for $610 million in cash, CNBC reported.

The companies aim to close the deal Atlassian’s fiscal second quarter, which ends in December.

Established in 2019, The Browser Co. has gone up against some of the world’s largest companies, including Google, with Chrome, and Apple, which includes Safari on its computers running MacOS.

The startup debuted Arc, a customizable browser with a built-in whiteboard and the ability to share groups of tabs, in 2022. The Dia browser, a simpler option that allows people to chat with an AI assistant about multiple browser tabs at once, became available in beta in June.

Atlassian co-founder and CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes said he sees shortcomings in the most popular browsers for those who do much of their work on computers.

TechCrunch reported: Productivity software maker Atlassian has agreed to acquire The Browser Company, which makes the Arc and Die browsers, for $610 million in cash.

“Today’s browsers weren’t built for work; they were built for browsing. This deal is a bold step forward in reimagining the browser for knowledge work in the AI era,” said Mike Cannon-Brooks, Atlassian’s CEO and co-founder, said in a statement.

“Together, we’ll create an AI-powered browser optimized for the many SaaS applications living in tabs – one that knowledge workers will love to use every day,” he added.

The Browser Company’s CEO Josh Miller, said on a post on X that his company will operate independently under Atlassian and will continue to develop Dia, the browser started working on last year after deciding to stop development of its previous browser, Arc.

Miller said the deal would allow The Browser Company to hire and ship features faster and support multiple platforms. 

The deal is expected to close in the second quarter of Atlassian’s fiscal year 2026.

Endgadget reported: The Browser Company — the maker of Arc and AI-centric Dia browsers — is set to have a new owner. Atlassian is buying it for around $610 million in an all-cash deal, which it expects to close in the second quarter of its fiscal year 2026.

According to The Browser Company, it will continue to operate independently as it builds Dia. A private beta for the browser started in June. Arc, a well-regarded browser on which the company as ended active development, and Arc Search will stick around, and a long-term plan for those will be revealed n the near future.


Google Stock Jumps 8% After Worst-Case Penalties In Antitrust Case



Alphabet shares popped 8% in extending trading as investors celebrated what they viewed as minimal consequences from a historic defeat last year in the landmark antitrust case, CNBC reported.

Last year, Google was found to hold an illegal monopoly in its core market of internet search.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled against the most severe consequences that were proposed by the Department of Justice, including the forced sale of Google’s Chrome browser, which provides data that helps its advertising business deliver targeted ads.

“Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the financial judgement,” the decision stated.“Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

In his decision on Tuesday, Mehta said the the company can make payments to preload products, but it cannot have exclusive contracts that condition payments or licensing.

The DOJ had asked Google to stop the practice of “compelled syndication,” which refers to the practice of making certain deals with companies to ensure its search engine remains the default choice in browsers and smartphones.

TechCrunch reported: Google will not be forced to break up but a federal judge has tentatively ordered other changes to the tech giant’s business practices to keep it from further anticompetitive behavior.

U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta outlined remedies on Tuesday that would bar Google from entering or maintaining exclusive deals that tie the distribution of Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, or Gemini to other apps or revenue or arrangements. For example, Google wouldn’t be able to condition Play Store licensing on the distribution of certain apps, or tie revenue-share payments to keeping certain apps.

Google will also have to share certain search index and user-interaction data with “qualified competitors” to prevent exclusionary behavior, and it must offer search and search ad syndication services to competitors at standard rates so they can deliver quality results building their own technology.

Metha has not yet issued a final judgement. Instead, he ordered Google and the Department of Justice to “meet and confer” and submit a revised final judgement by September 10 that aligns with his opinion.

Politico reported: A federal judge refused to break up Google for monopolizing the online search and ad markets, and instead imposed lesser restrictions to curb the power of the $2 trillion company.

In a closely watched antitrust trial pitting the U.S. government against one of the world’s largest tech firms, District Judge Amit Mehta on Tuesday rejected the Justice Department’s request to force Google to spin off its Chrome browser and Android products.

Google must now share some of its search data with competitors, and is prohibited from inking deals that make its products — including its artificial intelligence – the default tools on mobile devices.


OpenAI To Safeguard ChatGPT For Teens And People In Crisis



ChatGPT guardrails for teens and people in emotional distress will roll out by the end of the year, OpenAI promised Tuesday, Axios reported.

Why it matters: Stories about ChatGPT encouraging suicide or murder or failing to appropriately intervene have been accumulating recently, and people close to those harmed are blaming or suing OpenAI.

ChatGPT currently directs users expressing suicidal intent to crisis hotlines. OpenAI says it does not currently refer self-harm cases to law enforcement, citing privacy concerns.

Last week, the parents of a 16-year-old Californian who killed himself last spring sued OpenAI, suggesting that the company is responsible for their son’s death.

Between the Lines: The work to improve how its models recognize and respond to signs of mental and emotional distress has already been underway, OpenAI said in a blog post today.

The post outlines how the company has been making it easier for users to reach emergency services and get expert help, strengthening protections for teens and letting people add trusted contacts to the service.

OpenAI posted: Our work to make ChatGPT as helpful as possible is constant and ongoing. We’ve seen people turn to it in the most difficult of moments. That’s why we continue to improve how our models recognize and respond to signs of mental and emotional distress, guided by expert input.

This work has already been underway, but we want to proactively preview our plan for the next 120 days, so you won’t need to wait for launches to see where we’re headed. The work will continue well beyond this period of time, but we’re making a focused effort to launch as many of these improvements as possible this year.

Last week, we shared four focus areas when it comes to helping people when they need it most:

Expanding interventions to more people in crisis

Making it even easier to reach emergency services and get help from experts

Enabling connections to trusted contacts

Strengthening protections for teens.

The Guardian reported: Parents could be alerted if their teenagers show acute distress while talking with ChatGPT, amid child safety concerns as more young people turn to AI chatbots for support and advice.

The alerts are part of new protections for children using ChatGPT to be rolled out the next month by OpenAI, which was last week sued by the family of a boy who took his own life after allegedly receiving “months of encouragement” from the system.

Other new safeguards will include parents being able to link their accounts to those of their teenagers and controlling how the AI model responds to their child with “age-appropriate model behaviour rules.” But internet safety campaigners said steps did not go far enough and AI chatbots should not be on the market before they are deemed safe for young people.