The US FTC Releases Four Year Study On Social Media Sites Collecting Data



The Federal Trade Commission posted a Press Release titled: FTC Staff Report Finds Large Social Media and Video Streaming Companies Have Engaged In Vast Surveillance of Users with Lax Privacy Controls and Inadequate Safeguards for Kids and Teens.

A new Federal Trade Commission staff report that examines the data collection and use practices of major social media and video streaming services shows they engaged in vast surveillance of consumers in order to monetize their personal information while failing to adequately protect users online, especially children and teens.

The staff report is based on responses to 6(b) orders issued in December 2020 to nine companies including some of the largest social media and video streaming services: Amazon.com, Inc., which owns gaming platform Twitch; Facebook Inc. (now Meta Platforms, Inc.); YouTube LLC; Twitter, Inc. (now X Corp); Snap Inc; ByteDance Ltd., which owns the video-sharing platform TikTok; Discord Inc,; Reddit, Inc.; and WhatsApp Inc.

The orders asked for information about how the companies collect, track and use personal and demographic information, how they determine which ads and other content are shown to consumers, whether and how they apply algorithms or data analytics to personal and demographic information, and how their practice impact children and teens.

The Guardian reported social media and online video companies are collecting huge troves of your personal information on and off their websites or apps and sharing it with a wide range of third-party entities, a new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) staff report on nine tech companies confirms.

The FTC report published on Thursday looked at the data gathering practices of Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, Discord, Reddit, Amazon, Snap, TikTok, and Twitter/X between January 2019 and 31 December 2020. The majority of the companies’ business models incentivized tracking how people engaged with their platforms, collecting their personal data and using it to determine what content and ads users see on their feeds, the report states.

CBS News reported child advocates have long complained that federal child privacy laws let social media services off the hook provided their products are not directed at kids and that their policies formally bar minors on their sites. Big tech companies also often claim not to know how many kids use their platforms, critics have noted.

The report recommends steps, including federal legislation, to limit surveillance and give consumers rights over their data.

Congress is also moving to hold tech companies accountable for how online content affects kids. In July, the Senate overwhelmingly passed bipartisan legislation aimed at protecting children called the Kids Online Safety Act. The bill would require companies strengthen kids’ privacy and give parents more control over what content their children see online.

In my opinion, I think the FTC is correct about not only providing their press release, but also to alert parents that not all social media sites are safe for their children and teens.


Google Wins EU Antitrust Fine Fight



Alphabet unit Google won a legal challenge on Wednesday against a 1.49 billion euro ($1.7 billion) European Union antitrust fine, while Qualcomm failed to repeal a penalty, Reuters reported.

The rulings underscore outgoing EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager’s mixed record in defending her crackdown on Big Tech in court. She scored two major wins last week against Google in a separate case and against Apple’s tax deal with Irish authorities.

The European Commission in its 2019 decision said Google had abused its dominance to prevent websites from using brokers other than it’s AdSense platform that provided search adverts. The practices it said were illegal took place from 2006 to 2016.

The Luxembourg-based General Court mostly agreed with the European Union competition enforcer’s assessments of the case, but annulled the fine, saying that the Commission had failed to take into account all the relevant circumstances.

According to Reuters, the AdSense fine, one of a trio of fines that have cost Google at total of 8.25 billion euros, was triggered by a complaint by Microsoft in 2010.

CNBC reported The European Union’s second-highest court on Wednesday said a 1.5 billion euro ($1.7 billion) fine imposed on Google by regulators should be annulled, siding with the U.S. tech giant after it challenged the ruling.

The case stems from 2019 when the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, said Alphabet owned Google had abused its market dominance in relation to a product called AdSense for Search. This product allowed website owners to deliver ads into the search results on their own pages.

Google acts as an intermediary allowing advertisers to serve ads via search on third-party websites.

But the commission alleged that Google abused its market dominance by imposing a number of restrictive clauses in contracts with third-party websites, which ultimately prevented rivals from placing their search ads on these websites.

The commission fined Google 1.49 billion euros at the time. Google appeals, sending the case to the EU’s General Court.

The General Court said Wednesday that it “upholds the majority of the findings” but “annuls the decision by which the Commission imposed a fine of” nearly 1.5 billion euros.

The court added that the commission “failed to take into consideration all the relevant circumstances in its assessment of the duration of the contract clauses” that it had deemed abusive.

TechCrunch reported Google has succeeded in overturning a $1.7 billion antitrust penalty handed down by the European Union back in March 2019.

The €1.49 billion fine, which Google appealed, was originally issued after the European Commission found the tech giant’s search ads brokering business had violated competition rules between 2006 and 2016 to cement a dominant position.

On Wednesday, the EU’s General Court upheld the majority of EU’s findings, but annulled the earlier decision in its entirety after finding that the Commission had failed to take into consideration all the relevant circumstances when assessing the duration of the contract clauses it deemed abusive.

In my opinion, this is an unexpected win for Google. It is unclear to me why EU’s General Court decided to overturn it’s previous decisions regarding Google’s AdSense.


Instagram Is Putting Every Teen Into A More Private and Restrictive New Account



Starting today, Instagram will begin putting new and existing users under the age of 18 into “Teen Accounts” — a move that will affect how tens of millions of teens interact with the platform, The Verge reported.

The new account type automatically applies a set of protections to young users, and only users of 16 years or older can loosen some of these settings.

For starters, the accounts of all minors on Instagram will be private by default (not just teens under 16) and will come with some of Instagram’s existing restrictions for young users, such as has those that prevent strangers from direct messaging them. But other new features are coming too, including a Sleep Mode that silences notifications from 10PM to 7AM.

Teens will also get to pick age-appropriate topics that they can see more of in Instagram’s recommendations and on the Explore page, such as “sports,” “animals & pets,” “travel,” and more. Instagram will continue limiting the types of content teens see on Reels or on the Explore page. It will also send alerts reminding teens to take breaks from the app.

Along with these changes, Instagram is updating some of its parental controls. Parents who want to supervise their teen on the app will be able to see who their child has messaged in the past seven days (without seeing the contents of the messages). They’ll also get to see which topics their teen has chosen to view most often.

The Guardian reported Meta is putting Instagram users under the age of 18 into new “teen accounts” to allow parents greater control over their activities, including the ability to block children from viewing the app at night.

The change will apply to new teen users but will also be extended to existing accounts held by teenagers over the next few months.

Changes under the teen account setting include giving parents the ability to set daily time limits for using the app, block teens from using Instagram at certain times, see accounts their child is exchanging messages with and being shown the content categories they are viewing.

Teenagers signing up to Instagram are already placed by default into the strictest privacy settings, which include barring adults from messaging teens who don’t follow them and muting notifications at night. 

However, under the new “teen account” feature users under the age of 16 will need parental permission to change those settings, while 16- and 17-year-olds defaulted into the new features will be able to change them independently. Once an under-16 tries to change their settings, the parental supervision features will allow adults to set new time limits, block access at night and view who their child exchanges messages with.

BBC reported Instagram is overhauling the way it works for teenager, promising more “built-in protections” for young people and added controls and reassurance for parents.

The new “teen accounts” are being introduced from Tuesday in the UK, US, Canada, and Australia.

They will turn many privacy settings on by default for all under 18s, including making their content unviewable to people who don’t follow them, and making them actively approve all new followers.

In my opinion, it is a good idea for parents of teens to set boundaries for when their teens can use Instagram. Parents should also take a look at who their teens have been following.

 

 


OpenAI’s New Model and Its Advanced Memory/Reasoning Capabilities #1766



OpenAI’s latest AI model, codenamed “Strawberry,” has raised concerns about its ability to remember conversations and reason like humans. A Reddit user reported ChatGPT asking personal questions without prior input, sparking debates over AI memory capabilities. Experts warn this innovation may pose risks, including deception and misuse, with calls for legislation to regulate AI development.

Subscribe to the Newsletter.
Join the Chat @ GeekNews.Chat
Email Todd or follow him on Facebook.
Like and Follow Geek News Central’s Facebook Page.
Download the Audio Show File
New YouTube Channel – Beyond the Office

Support my Show Sponsor: Best Godaddy Promo Codes
$11.99 – For a New Domain Name cjcfs3geek
$6.99 a month Economy Hosting (Free domain, professional email, and SSL certificate for the 1st year.) Promo Code: cjcgeek1h
$12.99 a month Managed WordPress Hosting (Free domain, professional email, and SSL certificate for the 1st year.) Promo Code: cjcgeek1w
Support the show by becoming a Geek News Central Insider

Continue reading OpenAI’s New Model and Its Advanced Memory/Reasoning Capabilities #1766


iOS 18 Is Available Today, Making iPhone More Personal Than Ever



Apple announced iOS 18 is now available, bringing iPhone users around the world new ways to personalize their iPhone with deeper customization to the Home Screen and Control Center; the biggest-ever redesign to Photos, making it even easier to find and relive special moments; and major enhancements to Messages and Mail.

Starting next month, iOS 18 will introduce Apple Intelligence, the personal intelligence system that combines the power of generative models with personal context to deliver intelligence that is incredibly useful and relevant while protecting users’ privacy and security.

More Customization Than Ever

In iOS 18, users can customize their Home Screen in exciting new ways by placing app icons and widgets to frame the wallpaper or create the ideal layout on each page. Users can also choose how the app icons and widgets are presented — light, dark, or with a colored tint — or make app icons appear even larger for a new streamlined look. 

Control Center is redesigned to be even more flexible. Powerful groups of controls, including favorites, media playback, Home controls and connectivity, and the new controls gallery featuring options from third-party-apps — can be organized so that they’re always just a swipe away. Users can also access their favorite controls from the Action button, and for the first time, users can change the controls on the Lock Screen or remove them entirely.

The Biggest Photos Redesign

The biggest-ever update to Photos makes it easier to find and relive special moments. The beautiful, simplified layout puts the library into a unified yet familiar view. New collections like Recent Days, People & Pets, and Trips automatically keep the library organized with on-device intelligence, so users can spend less time searching and more time enjoying their memories. 

Users can personalize their experience with a customizable layout that reflects what is most important to them and pin favorite collections to keep them easily accessible.

Engadget reported Apple’s iOS 18 is available today, but your iPhone may mot be compatible.

Apple just released its new iOS 18 for all eligible iPhones to download free today, which you can find in the Software Update settings. And if you’re planning to buy one of the new iPhone 16 or iPhone 16 Pro models coming available on September 20, they’ll already have iOS 18 installed. But not every iPhone will be able to run iOS 18, and even the once that can won’t have the bells and whistles of the new Apple Intelligence features.

That update stratification is nothing now. Generally, each year, some older iPhone models are removed from Apple’s iOS eligibility list. Last year, for instance, the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, and iPhone X were left off the compatibility list. That means that those iPhone owners couldn’t update to iOS 17 and missed out on some notable features,

On the flip side, some older hardware will get major new features: Considering the upcoming software update that effectively turns existing AirPods Pro headphones into a hearing aid, complete with a built-in hearing test. (Apple just received FDA authorization to release that feature later this year.)

In my opinion, there are going to be a lot of people lined up at their nearest Apple Store today, hoping to get the brand new iOS 18 model.


Thinking about an EV? Part 1 – How Does an EV Work?



While many countries are encouraging motorists to embrace electric vehicles (EVs), there is a massive amount of FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) regarding the new vehicles. Some of it comes from vested interests, some of it from ignorance, but I’ve had an EV for over 10 years now and I think they’re great. My first two cars were plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) – that’s where there’s a smaller battery backed up by a petrol engine – but my current car of nearly three years is completely battery powered (BEVs).

Now, I’ll be the first to admit that the automotive industry and general society is in a period of change. We’ve been used to mass ownership of cars fuelled by petrol for about 70 years and switching to electricity doesn’t happen overnight. However, I’ve seen the change over the past decade and while EVs might not be for everyone, they can be right for many people.

Today’s discussion will focus on what makes an EV go, Obviously, EVs use electricity to power the vehicle rather than petrol (gas) and diesel. It’s potentially a clean source of power both when generated from renewable sources and when used in the vehicle – there are no nasty noxious fumes or particulates emitted from the exhaust. Simplistically, a large battery stores the electricity which is then used by motors to make the wheels go round. On the whole, it’s all straightforward but let’s answer a few of the common questions about EVs and driving one.

Do I need to pass another driving test or get a special driving licence?

If you are worried about being able to drive an EV, don’t be. If you have a driving licence that covers cars, you can drive an EV. It’s basically the same as driving a petrol or diesel vehicle with an automatic gearbox, only much quieter and cleaner. If anything, it’s a great deal simpler. Turn on the ignition to start the car…put a foot on the brake and put the car into Drive…press the accelerator…the car goes forward. Exactly the same as an automatic.

How is electricity stored in the car?

Electricity is stored in a battery that’s quite similar to the battery in your smartphone or tablet, only much, much bigger. The liquid fuel tank in your petrol or diesel vehicle is normally described in terms of volume – say, 30 gallons or 80 litres. In an EV, the battery is the equivalent of the tank and it’s measured in kWh – kilowatt hours – so you might see cars with 50 kWh batteries or 80 kWh batteries. As with a fuel tank, the bigger the battery, the further the car will go, though bigger batteries are heavier and do cost more, which is a downside.

How do I charge the battery?

Fundamentally there are two options. You charge slowly overnight at home or quickly at a commercial charge point or charging station. If you are able to charge at home, you can usually take advantage of cheap overnight electricity rates for lower cost motoring.

Hold on….I can charge at home?

Yes. While there are some solutions for people who park in the street, it’s best if you have a driveway and you can have a home charger (aka wall box) installed by a professional electrician. Costs will vary depending on the features of the charger and the ease of installation. There are sometimes grants to help cover the costs but expect to pay £500-£1000 for the unit and the installation.

The good news is that the charger will work with many different cars so you are very unlikely to have to change anything when you switch cars. I’m still using the same charger three cars on.

My car gives me 45 miles per gallon. What’s the equivalent with an EV?

With EVs people talk about miles per kWh. My car averages 2.9 miles per kWh though it’s a big SUV. A smaller, lighter car might do 4 miles per kWh.

Does that make an EV cheaper to run?

If you can charge at home, almost certainly. Let’s do the maths and work out the cost per mile based on fuel only.

Using my SUV model as an example as it comes in both petrol and electric versions, the petrol version gets about 37 mpg at best. Petrol is about £1.30 per litre here in the UK, so that’s £1.30 x 4.55 (litres in a UK gallon), giving £5.92 per gallon. Dividing that by the 37 mpg gives a cost of 15.9p per mile.

Taking the electric version, overnight I pay 18.4p per kWh to charge the car. I get 2.9 miles per kWh when I drive, so 18.4 / 2.9 gives 6.3p per mile.

(For the Americans, the calculation is similar, though I suspect you still buy gas per gallon. Yes, I know US and UK gallons are not the same but it doesn’t matter as long as you use US mpg figures.)

Whoa! That’s quite a saving. What if I can’t charge at home?

If you have to use a commercial charge point, it can cost anything from 30p to 70p per kWh, depending on the supplier, the power of the charger, whether you use an app and so on. This is not such good news and part of the extra cost is the VAT or sales tax. At home, the tax on electricity is 5% but at a charge point, it’s 20%. Don’t blame me, blame the Government. And obviously, the charge point operators are wanting to recoup their investment costs and they need to make a profit. If you can’t charge at home, do take this extra cost into consideration. Check the cost at your nearest commercial charge point.

If you don’t have a driveway, there are some options for cutting a groove in the pavement (Charge Gully) but you’ll need to consult with your local council as to what’s permissible.

How long does it take to charge?

It depends….the main factor is the power of the charger. If you are charging at home, it’s likely to be a relatively low power charger, say, 7 kW. This means that if the car has an 80 kWh battery, it will take a little over 11 hours to charge from empty. In reality, you rarely run the battery down to nothing but instead top the battery up every few days, maybe from 50%. I’m charging every third or fourth day based on my daily mileage.

If you go to a commercial high power charger, these can often deliver power in excess of 100 kW, which in theory means an 80 kWh battery charges in under an hour. This is dependent on the capability of the car to receive the power but most recent vehicles will be fine. Charging does slow down as the battery gets closer to 100% so often it’s best to only charge to only 80% or 90% to save time.

Is it easy to use a charger?

Yes. It’s a bit like using a petrol pump but with a big electrical plug on the end of a cable instead of a fuel nozzle. In Europe, most chargers will use the CCS and CCS2 connectors. There’s an older connector type called CHAdeMO but it’s gradually disappearing.

Here’s the socket on my car. The CCS part is on the top, with the CCS2 extension on the bottom. The CCS socket can be used on its own with low power chargers such as when you are charging at home. High power chargers use both connectors.

In terms of paying for the charge, it’s getting easier. There are lots of suppliers on the market so you’ll probably end up with a clatter of apps on your phone, but recent legislation says that all high power chargers have to support swiping a credit or debit card without the need to sign up. Personally, I find that the chargers which use RFID fobs or cards are the easiest and quickest to get started.

Watch out for overstay fees. To stop people hogging chargers, some suppliers will make you pay extra if you stay too long, particularly at the high power chargers.

What about charging when I’m away from home?

Broadly, there are two categories of chargers that you are looking for when you are away from home. The first are the chargers that you need en route to get to where you are going. These are typically high power chargers and are usually found close to major routes. Ideally you want to spend a short amount of time at these, preferably less than an hour.

Destination chargers are chargers often offered by hotels and other facilities where you might be spending more time. These chargers won’t be as powerful but you’ll leave your car connected to these longer, perhaps overnight. Contact the hotel to see what they can offer.

There are several good apps and websites such as Zap Map and PlugShare that show both the location of chargers and if the charger is in use. This is great if you are heading to a charger and you want to be reasonably confident it’s going to be available when you get there. I’ll talk more about travelling away from home in my next article about EVs, “How Far Does an EV Go?”

That concludes the first post in the series and I hope it helps some of the “EV curious” understand EVs a little bit better. If you’ve any further queries, drop them in as questions below.


TikTok Is About To Get Its Day In Court



Next week, a court will hear arguments about whether the US government can ban TikTok, based on evidence it doesn’t want anyone — including the social media company — to see, The Verge reported.

On September 16th, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia will hear oral arguments for TikTok v. Garland, TikTok’s First Amendment challenges to legislation that it claims amounts to a ban. It’s a fight not just about free speech but whether the Department of Justice can make a case using classified material that its opponent can’t review or argue against. The government argues TikTok is a clear national security threat, but says that revealing why would be a threat, too.

According to The Verge, TikTok’s suit stems from a law signed by President Joe Biden back in April. The law requires TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to divest it within nine months to a non-Chinese company; if it fails, the app would be effectively banned in the US – unless the president grants it a few months to get a deal done.

TikTok has argued the law would unconstitutionally “force a shutdown,” accusing the government of taking “the unprecedented step of expressly angling out and banning TikTok.

The Hill reported bipartisan efforts to ban TikTok nationwide will be scrutinized Monday by a federal appeals court tasked with weighing whether axing the social media giant’s U.S. presence runs afoul of the First Amendment.

The social media platform and a group of content creators have sued over a new law that could ban the app, placing free speech concerns front and center but also raising a handful of other issues.

On Monday morning, the three-judge federal appeals court panel in the nation’s capital will hear their challenges and decide whether to block the law from going into effect as scheduled on Jan. 19.

President Biden signed the legislation in April after quickly passed Congress with bipartisan support, kicking into place the timeline for TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, to sell the platform or face a ban from U.S. app stores and networks.

ByteDance has contends divestment is practically impossible, meaning that the law effectively amounts to a nationwide ban of the video-sharing platform. 

Voice of America reported attorney’s representing the social media application TikTok and it’s China-based parent company ByteDance, are poised to clash with lawyers from the Department of Justice on Monday in a case that could decide the fate of the service in the United States.

The case, which will be heard at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, consolidate several lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of a law enacted earlier this year. The measure, which had broad bipartisan support in Congress, demands that ByteDance sell TikTok to a non-Chinese owner before January 19, 2025, or be forced to shut down its service within the U.S.

The law’s challengers claim that it represents an unconstitutional suppression of free speech, violating the First Amendment rights of TikTok’s estimated 170 million U.S. users.

In my opinion, the situation with TikTok (and ByteDance) just keeps going around and around. Ideally, TikTok and ByteDance might have to face consequences for collecting data from American citizens.