Feedburner has a nice service but the question remains why would 100,000 people trust a third party to update and maintain the lifeblood of the one single document that connects most sites to their readership. The trend is quite shocking. The second question I raise and I will admit Feedburner has some cool tools the question I as is why
Update: FeedBurner folks are saying that the TWIT feed has some API feature enabled that allowed the sharing of their subscriber data. It's a catch 22 you choose not to enable it, and you will be pulled from a ranking list. Feedburner is saying they will have to do some more educating their users. Leo Laporte makes a update on
I have had a number of people ask me to explain in more detail what I would like to see in the way of enhancements to the statistics of RSS feeds that I can control on my own server. If you are using FeedBurner today, and that service disappeared tomorrow were would you turn to get the type of info
Hey Doc I do it every day, I have enough unique search terms setup to get a idea of who is getting it and who isn't. I will say this all of them are missing a great deal and I am unsure how to explain it. I am almost positive that they really pay attention to the Top 100 or
First of all if you trust putting your eggs in one basket, and pushing your readers to pick up your RSS feeds over at FeedBurner, then you are asking for trouble. No one is going to track my readers, and we don't track or analyze our RSS feed subscribers. Those of you using FeedBurner, I suggest you look at your