Google has filed a proposal outlining how it would remedy the antitrust violation it’s been accused of by the Department of Justice, after the DOJ called for Google to sell off Chrome and face restrictions that would prevent it from favoring its own search engine in Android, Engadget reported.
Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in August that Google has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, and called Google “a monopolist.”
Google said in the proposal filed on Friday night that it disagreed with the ruling but suggested ways to make its contacts with browser companies and Android device makers more flexible.
In a blog post summarizing the filing, Google’s VP of regulatory affairs Lee-Ann Mulhollalland wrote that the proposal would let browser companies like Apple and Mozilla “continue to offer Google Search to their users and earn revenue from that partnership,” while allowing them to have “multiple default agreements across different platforms (e.g., a different default search engine for iPhones and iPads) and growing modes.”
Google says it plans to appeal the judge’s decision ahead of a hearing in April, and will submit a revised proposal on March 7.
Google posted on The Keyword: We strongly disagree with and will appeal the decision in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) search distribution lawsuit.
As the Court found, Google achieved its popularity and success through innovation: by building the best search engine and making smart investment and business decisions, like our early investment in mobile. People don’t use Google because they have to — they use it because they want to.
And what’s more, the landscape the Court evaluated is highly dynamic. Since the trial ended over one year ago, AI has already rapidly reshaped the industry, with new entrants and new ways of finding information making it even more competitive.
Today, we filed our own proposal based on the actual findings in the Court’s decision. This was a decision about our search distribution contracts, so our proposed remedies are directed to that.
TechCrunch reported: Google has offered up its own proposal in a recent antitrust case that saw the US Department of Justice argue that Google must sell its Chrome browser.
US District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search, with the DOJ then proposing a number of remedies, including the sale of Chrome, the spinoff of its Android operating system, and a prohibition on entering into exclusionary search agreements with browser and phone companies.
As an alternative, Google proposes that it still be allowed to make search deals with companies like Apple and Mozilla, but they should have the option to set different defaults on different platforms (for example, iPhone vs iPad) and in different browsing modes.
In my opinion, it sounds like the U.S. Department of Justice wants Google to sell off Crome. I suspect this is going to be an interesting court case.