Guest Rob Greenlee from Zune and Jeffrey Powers from Geekazine and dig into what has been happening in tech and trends that we are seeing develop along with the popular memes. Subscribe to The Saturday Morning Tech show. This show is recorded every Saturday that I am home, it is currently advertiser free, we hope that you will support the show by becoming an insider.
The number 1 request by all of you that filled out the survey was more unique content. I am going to do my best to deliver it along with the standard fare. New contest to win a Roku is on now winner next week listen to win. Big Thank You to all three sponsors of the show this month. If your a business owner check out the offering from Infusionsoft they have some very unique business offerings.
These companies keep the lights on here at GNC your support is appreciated!
Sponsor: Save money at GoDaddy using my Promo Codes significant Cash Savings.
Sponsor: Visit gotomeeting.com, click the try it free button & use promo code: Podcast.
Sponsor: Infusionsoft, the leader in marketing automation software for small businesses.
Follow @geeknews on Twitter
My Facebook Profile
Podcast Facebook Page
My YouTube Channel
Visit the Ohana Store for GNC Gear!
Streams Justin.tv / Ustream.TV
To Comment on show call 1-619-342-7365 or e-mail email@example.com
The Geek’s Show Links:
Flawed Climate Report gets Reviewed.
Roku Lowers the Price dramatically.
Chrome7 to Tap Graphics Card.
Hotmail gets Exchange ActiveSync.
Rare Earth Metals get more Rare.
Gulf Stream to Power Florida?
Sony blocks PS3 Hack in Court.
NASA Pictures to Flickr.
UAV for Search and Rescue.
Google and AP kiss and Make Up.
Go Get Dictionary no More!
Samsung Galaxy S Sales!
Mining the Asteroid Belt?
Canadian Consumers win Big on ISP Competition.
Gates + Monsanto = Poor Choice.
First Leashes now RFID Chips!
Did your Twitter App die Today?
Headline Breath Test.
Are you a Pencil Fanatic?
Your Remains Pressed into LP’s.
Top Ten Technologies lost.
Get your iPad next day Delivery.
Autocad 11 for Mac.
10 Soldering Rules.
Gmail Priority Inbox.
iPhone 4 Still Broke.
Go Old School in the Typewriter hack.
Forced to use IE6?
Worlwide Population Chart.
Can’t Tie your Shoes don’t Worry.
Consumer Online Shopping Trends.
Web Aggregation today.
Digg Users Riot.
Clearwire Unlimited 4g Pay as you Go!
Old is a State of Mind!
Retargeting Ads are Annoying.
Evoting Critic out of Jail.
Send in your stories to firstname.lastname@example.org and be sure to provide a link to your websites!
In the world of blogging, podcasting and social networking, much has been said about the so-called “long tail.” The concept of the “long tail” revolves around the idea that available content living on the Internet gets a lot of extra audience over a long period of time, as opposed to traditional print and broadcast content which has a much more limited lifespan.
As services such as Netflix gain popularity, yet another form of content is experiencing the benefits of the long tail – movies and TV shows that are available for long-term streaming. An excellent example of how the “long tail” benefits movies in particular are obscure documentaries that in the old pre-streaming days would have a limited initial audience and then end up on a shelf somewhere or be sold in consumer video release one at a time.
Now more obscure movies and TV shows that had a limited lifespan and limited impact are able to take a new lease-on life that used to simply not exist.
I am particularly enjoying streaming documentaries on Netflix. There are some real gems out there. One documentary I really enjoyed in particular that I’d never heard of before I found it on Netflix is called “Cowboy Del Amor.” It’s about a Texas matchmaker who specializes in matching up American men with Mexican women. If you haven’t seen this gem, I highly recommend it. “Cowboy Del Amor” is but one example of movies that have a very limited promotion budgets and therefore are unable to make much of a publicity splash when they are released, yet they can be absolutely fantastic movies to not only watch yourself but to share later with friends and family.
I dropped my Dish Network account in July 2010 and have not looked back. Streaming videos via services such as Netflix forces me to take a much more active role in selecting something good to watch. Having literally tens of thousands of movies and videos available for instant streaming on demand is a far superior way to find and consume commercial content.
For some time we’ve been hearing about the virtues of cloud-based computing.
Certain functions seem to lend themselves to the cloud. Online word processing, spreadsheets, etc. can seem to make sense in some situations, such as collaborating with others.
In everyday use scenarios, does the cloud really make sense in more traditional private computer-use situations? I contend that it does not.
Right now I’m typing this into Microsoft Word on my MacBook Pro. At the moment I have rather lousy Sprint and Verizon connectivity, even though 12 hours ago at this very same location I had really good connectivity from both. The only thing that changed is the time of day. If I was currently limited to using Google Docs chances are I would be unable to write this. Network demand constantly fluctuates depending on the time of day and location.
Is there enough bandwidth available? With the tsunami of smartphones that are on the immediate horizon, will the carriers be able to keep up with the average five-fold bandwidth demand increase that the average smartphone user pulls from the network? Can carriers keep up with a smartphone-saturated public all trying to pull down data at the same time?
However, for the sake of argument let’s say that mobile Internet connectivity isn’t an issue.
What if the Internet is turned off due to a declared cyber attack and all of your documents are online? What good would the network appliance approach to computing be then?
Can e-books be revised after the fact? If government can simply decide to turn off the Internet, then it’s not that much of a leap to imagine laws and regulations being passed banning certain types of blogs or even books that have been deemed dangerous or seditious. There have already been books sold such as “1984” by Amazon that were deleted from Kindles after the fact by Amazon when it was determined that Amazon didn’t have the legal right to sell it in e-book form. What if instead of banning books, they were simply rewritten to remove the offending parts? What’s to stop instant revision of e-books that have been declared dangerous?
How social media points the way forward for journalism. It’s a real example of how traditional media are becoming social media-aware and are using Facebook, Twitter and their ilk to get the news stories out faster and with more information.
However, what really registered with me is at the very end of the article.
There is a word of caution that goes with trusting what we read on this great “word of mouth” network. Recent rumour mill stories on Facebook on the private lives of footballers ended up in the press and were proven to be totally wrong. So while this new technology can speed up the newsgathering process, journalists will need to make sure they do what they have always done – double check the facts.
I have real concerns about the loss of the old news media. Obviously there’s no single cause but the rise of new media, the Internet “no cost” expectation and the “now” culture are all taking the toll. But what will be the cost to our society when we no longer have professional journalists?
What will happen to investigative journalism? What will happen when hysterical but unfounded rumours sweep across the social networks? How will politicians be held to account when there is no-one to report on their mistakes? How much more easy will it be to cover stuff up?
I can’t think of a single other instance where it’s become acceptable for amateurs to take over the role of professionals. Would you want an amateur doctor to treat you? An amateur engineer to design a bridge? An amateur firefighter to attend an emergency? No, I want these people to study for years to become competent at what they do. Why should journalism be any different? Just because you can string a sentence together, doesn’t make you a journalist.
Now, you may think that it’s a bit rich coming from a blogger for a major new media site but to tie this back to the original news story, I think it genuinely points the way ahead. We have to get away from old media v. new media, it has to be co-opetition not competition, symbiotic not parasitic, and we have to find a way to reward news organisations and professional journalists to keep doing what they’re doing.
I don’t have all the answers, but I do know is that it will be social disaster if we lose professional journalists because we were too cheap to buy a newspaper.