Dish + DirecTV = Real Competition for Cable/Telcos?



For the last two days there have been rumors swirling about the possibility of Dish Network and DirecTV attempting a merger. They tried it in 2001 but the FTC wouldn’t approve it. After the recent merger of XM and Sirius, I have to think the FTC has loosened their stance on not allowing large media providers to merge.

I would say the merger would be good, but only if it meant that the new company would focus on providing true competition, and figure out how to become large media providers. They will have to offer something different than just television service. They need to be able to move into the broadband market.

Our choices here are limited to bad, and worse than bad. We have Charter Cable in my local area, which is fast, but with horrible service and lots of outages (every time it storms, just about). I live in a neighborhood where all wiring is underground, and when there is a failure, the cable company simply strings a nice orange data cable from yard to yard until they get around to putting it back underground, which can be months. Last winter during snow removal, one of these orange cables was in the gutter of the street, and the snow plow snapped it in eight places, disconnecting cable to half the neighborhood. Then there’s AT&T, our only source of DSL, which is stable and works well. My fear of AT&T DSL is that they will start capping our bandwidth, which they are already talking about. I have the highest-end DSL, so I would think the cap would be higher because we pay more, but who knows? We don’t have alternatives like FIOS or Clearwire available here.

If the satellite companies could figure out how to deliver true high-speed, economical broadband service to homes, that might be a breakthrough worth cheering. The more competition we can see against behemoths like AT&T, the better it will be for all of us.


Does anyone truly own an Apple Product?



Let me share my feelings on Apple products. I don’t like them period. It is not because they suck or are not easy to use. Clearly they are user friendly and from what I hear do not suck. That is why they are so popular. But the company is so controlling about what you can do with their products. And make no mistake it is their product even after you put down your hard earned money for it. Sure you can use it when you want, take it where you want, even sell it when you get ready to do so. But try to alter it or use it in a way Apple does not care for, then you have trouble. And they can even disable your device in cases like the iphone. Try to move your itunes library to another computer or media device not made by Apple and you will see who really owns “your” stuff. I tried to get my wife’s songs from her itunes library into mp3 format so I could place them on a new Creative Mp3 player. Well if I wanted to burn cds of all the songs and go on a digital adventure that would last hours I would have went ahead. But I just gave up. I understand why they create a walled garden. It is to keep people using their devices the way Apple deems appropriate. But it also keeps people like me who like a little flexibility in their tech devices from buying Apple products. I know Steve Jobs will make it without my few dollars though:) .

The story Todd did on the last podcast about some people’s iphones getting disabled because they had an unauthorized application loaded on it really got to me. Either the phone is yours or it is not. The fact that a small percentage of people may get over in some way by not giving Apple more money does not justify keeping every single user from using their property how they want. When you by a new Dodge truck you have the ability to get accessories after the fact that were made by companies other than Dodge. When you buy a house from a builder he does not lock you out of your home when you don’t let him build on a new deck that your brother will do for free. I understand this is comparing apples to oranges but the principle holds true. Just because Apple can lock you out because it is a digital product does not make it right to do so. Wikipedia defines ownership as “the state or fact of exclusive rights and control over property”. If Apple controls your iphone or ipod after you bought it do you really own it?


Mark Cuban. MLB Savior?



Mark Cuban is among many who are bidding to buy the Chicago Cubs. Whether you like this guy or not it would be fantastic for Major League Baseball, not to mention the Cubs. MLB has had all kinds of troubles over the past decade or so from steroids to player strikes to an incompetent commissioner in Bud Selig. While these things have hurt “America’s Pastime”, it is the refusal to do new things & let the status quo go unchecked that bothers me most. Mark Cuban is one of the brightest people on the planet so I’d be more apt to make him commissioner than just an owner of a single team. As owner of the Cubs he could affect change by changing how his team does things so others will follow suit. I think Mark would have better ideas than turning a blind eye to steroid use just to get attendance numbers back up. He might actually institute some new technology and ideas.

The first thing he could do is make baseball players more accessible to fans. Nascar blew up because the average fan could talk to the drivers and team members in the pit area. His personal blog often covers his NBA team so instantly the average fan will get thoughts on their favorite team from the top guy. The next thing he would do would likely get the Cubs on HDNET as well as their local WGN channel. That would expand the viewership which is already huge for the Cubs. Another improvement he could make is push for better technology for the strike zone which is subjective to which human umpire is on the job. Also he could try to improve the game by speeding it up with a pitch clock that keeps the action going instead of wasting time between pitches. No one has time for four hour baseball games anymore. The biggest thing Cuban could do for baseball is just be different than all the ancient owners that are currently there. These guys likely don’t care about high def, the internet, and have never heard of a blog. Even if you disagree with Cuban’s position on online videos and other issues relating to the web, at least he understands what is going on. He is not stuck in the 80’s or 90’s. As an owner he would have a voice in overall baseball policies. When Cuban bought the Dallas Mavericks that team was a joke but he turned them into a perpetual winner with great attendance. Think about what he could do with a team that already has a great fan base.

Likely the powers that be in Major League Baseball won’t allow Cuban to get into their elitist club because they like things the way they are currently. People don’t like change especially when it threatens their powerful positions. It is similar to how old media is holding on for dear life resisting change that is already here. The current leaders in baseball would rather keep things “the way we have always done it” than make a change for the better.


GNC-2008-08-08 #398 Great show tonight!



Lots of great tech news tonight, lots of trouble in the iPhone space. Mix up on OLPC resolved I hope. Congrats to our July money winners

Please Support my Show Sponsors!:
[Save 10% off on any order at GoDaddy.com!] Use Code Todd
[Try GoToMeeting free for 30 days at GoToMeeting.com/techpodcasts. No credit card needed.]

Twitter Me http://www.twitter.com/geeknews
My Facebook Profile
FriendFeed GNC Room!!
Comments to 619-342-7365 e-mail to geeknews@gmail.com

Listener Links:
Canada DMCA
www.chrisnewhamphotography.co.uk
Gas Price Checker
www.brrycast.com
Blubrry PowerPress Podcast Plugin

Show Notes:
Some people are just Dumb
Olympics Pollution ;)
Snowl
SolarCycle24.com
Recent Solar Eclipse
Is Apple Spying on You?
Six Degrees of Separation
SlingPlayer 2.0
SpaceX Falcon 1 Failure
California FasTrak Hackable
Pwnage Tool 2.0.2 Ready
CES 2009 Sponsor Search
What would you do?
Asus Heart beat Mouse
Google + Sprint
Sub-Zero Wife wants one
Awesome 3d Image of Brain
Tiered Broadband Unlikely?
Future of Linux?
New Apple Products in Sept?
Is BitTorrent Inc Deadpool?
Reporter Booted from Hacker conference for Hacking
iPhone 3g Boot Failures
Advanced Fingerprint Technology Stunning
Mars Lander Achievements and Post Winter Hopes
Perseid Meteor Shower can be Amazing

BLOCKBUSTER Total Access click to activate coupon for $10 off your first month.


Online Videos Can Spread Inspiration



Ever hear of a kid named Jason McElwain who is probably better known as J-Mac? If not then you missed out on one of the most inspirational stories ever. This young man with autism was the team manager for his high school basketball team in 2006. He finally got a chance to play in a game so he decided he would make the most of the time he got to play. With about 4 minutes to shine and this kid did not disappoint. He scored 20 points and hit six 3 pointers. When the game ended the whole gym went crazy because they were so happy for this guy.

His story on is on youtube here. The point of this post is to show how many people were affected by J-Mac’s story because of online video. His story is a great read but when put in video form it can touch more people. If a picture is worth 1000 words how many words is a video worth? ESPN was where I saw his highlight reel first so TV could have brought the inspiration once or twice then everyone who missed it was just out of luck. Now anyone who hears about the autistic kid who had never played in a high school game then lead his team in scoring the first chance he got, can see for themselves online. Think about how many families with autistic children were given hope by seeing a short clip on youtube. The video link I put above had 433,000 views and there were many more users with similar videos so I’d say millions were able to access inspiration online.

The video from the game was likely a low cost digital camera and the footage, while not great, was certainly watchable. The fact that the technology was there to capture the game then upload it to ESPN and youtube makes everyone’s life better. Believe me I have watched some crappy NBA games from the 80’s on ESPN Classic and that film was terrible compared to $500 consumer DV cameras today. For all the idiots falling down, breaking things, and generally acting stupid in online videos, at least there are a few stories worth watching and sharing.


A Dearth of Photographs



Yesterday, I was working on a deadline project so I had both my desktop machines going and my laptop as well. But I was spending most of the time on my desktops, so I set the screen saver on the laptop to run through all the pictures I’ve got in my My Pictures directory. This would be four years or so of pictures I’ve taken with my little point-and-shoot Kodak camera.

As they flashed by out of the corner of my eye, I realized just how many there were. Or maybe not. I left that screen saver run for several hours and did not reach to the end of the pictures. I was somewhere around 2006 when I bumped the mouse and turned the screen back on.

As those pictures flashed by, I realized that I probably could afford to delete some. The ones that are crooked, are pictures of the back of someone’s head, etc. That would probably get rid of about a third of them.

But still, that’s a lot of pictures, trapped on my hard drive. I’ve printed some, and sent them around to people via email, and put them on my blogs, but most of them sit, in digital format, where they will always sit and may never been seen by anyone but me. It’s rather like the five ginormous boxes of photos in my basement storage room that will never see the page of an album. After all, I’ve been taking pictures for nigh on forty years. I got my first camera at age 10 and never stopped clicking that shutter.

What to do with all that, whether they are digital or printed? Do I just keep accumulating and let my kids deal with it when I’m gone, like my parents have done?

I’m thinking I need to be more proactive in cleaning up this stuff and making it more manageable, not only for myself, but for my kids someday, since they are the ones that are going to have to clean it out. I just spent the better part of a long weekend going through an entire trunk of my mother’s photographs. I don’t want to leave that legacy for anyone.

What are others doing with all of their digital content, especially pictures? I’m curious.